Harvard Professor: U.S. Government UFO Report Should Lead to More Research on Alien Life
Suggests the private sector is the best place for alien research
A new report from the U.S. director of national intelligence detailing the prevalence of sightings of unidentified flying objects over the past 17 years has a Harvard professor urging more research into whether humans have been visited by life forms d ‘other planets.
“The Pentagon report presented to Congress on June 25 is intriguing enough to motivate a scientific investigation to identify unidentified aerial phenomena,” said Harvard science professor Avi Loeb. The College’s solution in a statement sent by email. “Some of the UAPs uncovered since March 2019 – when a new reporting mechanism was established by the US Navy, are likely real objects whose nature is unknown.”
According to the government report, 144 sightings of unidentified flying objects have been reported by government employees since 2004. With the exception of one case identified as a deflating balloon, each sighting was classified as “inconclusive” .
In 80 cases, objects were detected by several technological sensors mounted on military platforms – but as the report acknowledges, the sensors “are generally not suited to identify PANs.”
The report states that some objects “appeared to remain stationary in high winds, to move against the wind, to maneuver abruptly or to move at considerable speed, indiscriminately. [sic] means of propulsion.
“Most UAPs could have trivial explanations, but even if a single object is of extraterrestrial origin, it would have a huge impact on society,” Loeb said. “As we learned from the discovery of quantum mechanics a century ago, experimental anomalies are the precursor to the advancement of our scientific knowledge.”
The government report classifies UFO reports into five general categories: “Airborne Clutter” (birds, balloons, debris), “Natural Atmospheric Phenomena” (ice crystals, humidity), “USG or Industry Developmental Programs” government), and “Foreign Adverse Systems” (technologies deployed by China, Russia, another country or non-government entity) and “Other”.
It was the penultimate category that prompted the US government to take UFO sightings seriously.
“PSUs pose a danger to flight safety and could pose a broader danger if certain cases represent sophisticated collection against US military activities by a foreign government or demonstrate breakthrough aerospace technology by a potential adversary,” the report said.
Some professors are skeptical about the possibility that these UFOs could be of interplanetary origin.
“There is no evidence of this so far,” said Greg Eghigian, professor of history at Penn State. The College’s solution by email. “There is still a lot of research to be done before such a conclusion can be drawn. “
Eghigian, author of the 2017 study, “Making UFOs Make Sense: Ufology, Science, and the History of their Mutual Mistrust,” has traditionally been more cautious when it comes to alien speculation.
“My job isn’t to prove people right or to help strengthen arguments, but at the same time, it’s not to demystify these people, it’s not really the game,” said Eghigian in 2020 after the Pentagon released video of what appeared to be UFO videos.
“I’m trying to understand how this whole phenomenon and how this interest in flying saucers and UFOs developed and emerged, the types of ways it has changed over many decades, and how and why it has developed. is developed as it did. “
Eghigian said that the idea that these UFOs could be alien surveillance drones is “one of the more obvious possibilities.”
“Keep in mind that the report clearly shows something that government-sponsored surveys have shown: There are probably more than one explanation for these observations, not one. There is still a lot of work to be done. “
Loeb, author of the book “Alien: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth,” said he believed much of this work would likely be done through the private sector, rather than the private sector. through government or university research.
“Federal agencies, guided by committees led by traditional scientists, will naturally be slow to adapt to these new challenges,” he said. “But my journey in the philanthropy landscape implies that the private sector is more open-minded to fund an appropriate response.”
Loeb implored his fellow academics to take alien research more seriously, given the public’s fascination with the matter.
“If academia respected the public interest in UAP, a new standard could be set in which many more funds and talent will be drawn into the pursuit of evidence-based knowledge the way Galileo envisioned it.” “, did he declare. “There is nothing more exciting than a paradigm shift in how we perceive our place in the universe. Just as my daughters benefited greatly from being exposed to smarter kids in kindergarten, entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley could gain new aspirations through alien tech gear.
Loeb said he was surprised the Pentagon report was pushed back by both academics and Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence advocates.
“Much like in Galileo’s time, they prefer not to look through telescopes and argue that they need ‘extraordinary evidence’ before considering the possibility that an anomalous object could be the product of technology. alien, ”he said.
MORE: Harvard Department of Astronomy Chair: We received a visit from an alien artifact 3 years ago
IMAGE: We are / Shutterstock
As The College’s solution on Facebook / Follow us on twitter