Covid-19: World’s largest medical journal finally says virus COULD come from lab leak

The world’s leading medical journal has admitted the Covid pandemic could have been triggered by a lab leak and admits the virus may have been engineered by scientists.

It may seem like a no-brainer calling on global bodies to step up efforts to determine whether Covid-19 came from a lab in the Chinese city of Wuhan or jumped from animals infected with a bat virus.

But it’s a remarkable turnaround for the 199-year-old Lancet, which published an infamous article condemning suggestions of a lab leak as “conspiracy theories”.

However, the newspaper – which says the world should take the two main hypotheses ‘seriously’ – also suggested the virus could be linked to labs in the United States, raising fears it still furthers the cause of the virus. China rather than good science.

The world’s leading medical journal has admitted the Covid pandemic could have been triggered by a lab leak and admits the virus may have been engineered by scientists

To be sure, the Lancet Commission’s landmark report on Covid-19 raises many questions, including the alleged stifling of scientific debate, the role of experts, and the disturbing fear that the West may pander to Chinese dictatorship.

This survey – which concludes that the World Health Organization and many world leaders have reacted too slowly – was intended to be the authoritative inquiry into the pandemic. He points out that there are two “pathways of emergence” for the strange coronavirus that appeared at the end of 2019: by a “natural overflow event” of nature or by “research-related activities”.

Some diseases, such as the Sars outbreak of 2003, are known to have been attributed to “zoonotic” transmission (from animals to humans), although no proven animal hosts have been found for Sars-CoV- 2, the virus that causes Covid-19.

We also know that China covered up early cases, silenced doctors, resisted outside investigations, hid key data, and conducted high-risk experiments in maximum biosafety labs specializing in bat coronavirus research. in Wuhan.

Yet that investigation by The Lancet – now under attack by the oddly aggressive zoonotic lobby that rejects any suggestion of a lab leak – has been rife with controversy.

Shortly after the virus emerged, the journal published one of the most notorious scientific statements in recent history: a note from 27 experts attacking “conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 has no ‘natural origin’.

This influential letter played a vital role in silencing scientific, political and media discussion of any idea that the pandemic could have started with a laboratory incident.

That ended after The Mail on Sunday revealed in April 2020 that US-funded research at its Wuhan lab was focusing on bats captured 1,000 miles away in Yunnan province.

That ended after The Mail on Sunday revealed in April 2020 that US-funded research at its Wuhan lab was focusing on bats captured 1,000 miles away in Yunnan province.

However, it later emerged that it was authored by British scientist Peter Daszak, a long-time collaborator at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who was researching bat coronaviruses – despite concerns about safety known to the laboratory.

Daszak is the £357,000-a-year chairman of EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based group that funneled funds from the US to his friend Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan virologist known as ‘Bat Woman’ for his work collecting bat samples.

That ended after The Mail on Sunday revealed in April 2020 that US-funded research at its Wuhan lab was focusing on bats captured 1,000 miles away in Yunnan province.

Daszak and his allies have reacted with fury while continuing to denounce the lab leak hypothesis as a conspiracy theory – although data shows scientists in Wuhan, working with EcoHealth Alliance, have found close relatives of the pandemic virus in Yunnan bats.

Lancet editor Dr Richard Horton, who has twice been honored by Beijing, tweeted in June 2020: “Peter Daszak rejects conspiracy theories about the origins of Covid-19: and he knows more than the most… on coronaviruses.

Despite conflicts of interest, Daszak was asked to join the inquiry into the WHO’s origins in China and lead a Lancet commission inquiry alongside five of his fellow signatories, before being dumped after a outcry following my revelations.

Last October, The Lancet finally published an “alternative view” in which 16 scientists blasted Daszak for “imparting a silencing effect” on scientific debate.

Jeffrey Sachs, chairman of the commission and celebrity economist, caused a stir at a conference this year when he said he was “pretty convinced” that Covid “came out of American lab biotechnology, not nature” – a position misquoted and promoted by Chinese officials.

Some diseases, such as the Sars outbreak of 2003, are known to have been attributed to “zoonotic” transmission (from animals to humans), although no proven animal hosts have been found for Sars-CoV- 2, the virus that causes Covid -19

Some diseases, such as the Sars outbreak of 2003, are known to have been attributed to “zoonotic” transmission (from animals to humans), although no proven animal hosts have been found for Sars-CoV- 2, the virus that causes Covid -19

The report of his commission fuels this fire. It states that “independent researchers have not yet investigated US laboratories engaged in laboratory manipulation of Sars-CoV-like viruses” – before adding “nor have they investigated the details of the lab research that was going on in Wuhan.”

It might seem crazy to point blame for a possible lab leak in China to the United States. Yet there are justified concerns that Western funding agencies and scientists are tied to risky research.

And as a respected scientist told me, maybe the Chinese government is looking for a way to admit a lab accident while sharing the blame with the United States.

We know that scientists in Wuhan have been involved in collaborative projects funded by Washington and coordinated by EcoHealth Alliance, engaging in “gain-of-function” experiments that can potentially increase coronavirus infectivity and were first conducted by Western scientists.

Grant proposals were even found that included proposals to insert a furin cleavage site into bat coronaviruses. This feature, which allows Sars-Cov-2 to enter human cells more efficiently, is not found in similar coronaviruses.

And we have seen through Freedom of Information requests, leaks, books and investigative articles how some Western scientists privately feared that the virus could have been engineered and that the research was partly funded by the United States – but dismissed these ideas as they apparently led efforts to shut down the debate.

Key to these concerns are America’s two most influential scientists – presidential adviser Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins, then head of America’s top funding body – as well as Jeremy Farrar, director of Britain’s Wellcome Trust , which funded at least one study involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Farrar, along with two Wellcome colleagues, were among the signatories to this Lancet statement in February 2020, as well as coordinating another influential paper in Nature Medicine, stating that the authors “do not believe that any type of scenario in the laboratory is plausible’.

Despite conflicts of interest, Daszak was asked to join the inquiry into the WHO's origins in China and lead a Lancet commission inquiry alongside five of his fellow signatories, before being dumped after an outcry following my revelations.

Despite conflicts of interest, Daszak was asked to join the inquiry into the WHO’s origins in China and lead a Lancet commission inquiry alongside five of his fellow signatories, before being dumped after an outcry following my revelations.

The statement emerged following a confidential teleconference arranged by Farrar at the request of Fauci, who was joined by Collins and Sir Patrick Vallance, Britain’s chief scientific adviser. This newspaper obtained 32 emails regarding their discussions under freedom of information laws – but officials masked almost every word.

It took more than a year to figure out that Farrar and each of the five authors of the Nature Medicine statement had expressed private fears about the engineering of the virus or a secret novel coronavirus store being held in Wuhan.

It has been depressing to see how scientists – aided by journals with ties to China, weak politicians and clumsy media – have seemingly closed ranks, allowed documents to be suppressed, obstructed investigations, withheld information and smeared those who sought the truth about the most important events of our time. health problem.

This Lancet report therefore deserves some credit for laying out the bare facts about the origins of Sars-CoV-2 – and for stating that natural and research-related fallout remain plausible causes of the pandemic based on our current knowledge.

Yet how odd that this simple statement is still controversial, so toxic is the issue thanks to the deceptive actions of China and its shameful allies in the West.

Comments are closed.